Multiple Progeny Quantitative Trait


  The parameter file outlined below illustrates how to simulate a prolific species (i.e. Swine) with a threshold on the minimum number of progeny to select within each family.

−−−−−−−| Multiple Progeny Quantitative Trait |−−−−−−−
−| General |−
START: sequence
SEED: 1501
−| Genome & Marker |−
CHR: 3
CHR_LENGTH: 150 150 150
NUM_MARK: 4000 4000 4000
QTL: 150 150 150
−| Population |−
FOUNDER_Effective_Size: Ne70
MALE_FEMALE_FOUNDER: 25 200 random 3
VARIANCE_A: 0.35
−| Selection |−
GENERATIONS: 10
INDIVIDUALS: 25 0.2 200 0.2
PROGENY: 8
MAXFULLSIB: 2
SELECTION: ebv high
EBV_METHOD: pblup
CULLING: ebv 5
-| Mating |-
MATING: random125 simu_anneal

Parameter File Summary
  Sequence information is generated for three chromosomes with a length of 150 Megabases (Mb). The genome simulated has a high degree of short-range LD (Ne70). The SNP panel contains 12,000 markers (i.e. 4,000 markers per chromosome). For each chromosome, 150 randomly placed QTL and zero FTL mutations were generated. The quantitative trait simulated has a narrow sense heritability of 0.35 and only additive effects are generated (i.e. no dominance). The phenotypic variance is by default set at 1.0, and therefore the residual variance is 0.65. The founder population consisted of 25 males and 200 females. Random selecton of progeny and culling of parents was conducted for 3 generations. For each generation, a total of 25 males and 200 females are in the population. A total of 5 and 40 (0.2 replacement rate) male and female parents, respectively, are culled and replaced by new progeny each generation. After 3 generations, animals with a high EBV were selected or culled each generation. A total of 10 generations were simulated. The EBV are estimated using an animal model with a pedigree-based relationship matrix. Each mating pair produced eight progeny. Within each full-sib family a maximum of 2 progeny can be selected. Parents that had pedigree-based relationships greater than 0.125 were avoided, and this was optimized based on the simulated annealing method.

  Once the program has finished, inspection of the log file will provide details on the impact of the "MAXFULLSIB" option. Within the log file, after the "Begin ebv Selection of offspring" section, the number of times "n" number of siblings were selected within a family is outlined for each generation. This provides an overview of the degree of co-selection of siblings that occur based on the simulation design outlined above. If this option would not have been included, the maximum number of siblings that can be selected within a family would be the total number of offspring generated for each mating pair (i.e. 8).